SP Paper 311 (Web Only)
SL/S4/13/R25
25th Report, 2013 (Session 4)
Subordinate Legislation
Remit and membership
Remit:
The remit of the Subordinate Legislation Committee is to consider and report on—
(a)
(i) subordinate legislation laid before the Parliament;
(ii) any Scottish Statutory Instrument not laid before the Parliament but classed as general according to its subject matter;
and, in particular, to determine whether the attention of Parliament should be drawn to any of the matters mentioned in Rule 10.3.1;
(b) proposed powers to make subordinate legislation in particular Bills or other proposed legislation;
(c) general questions relating to powers to make subordinate legislation;
(Standing Orders of the Scottish Parliament, Rule 6.11)
Membership:
Nigel Don (Convener)
Jim Eadie
Mike MacKenzie
Hanzala Malik
John Pentland
John Scott
Stewart Stevenson (Deputy Convener)
Committee Clerking Team:
Clerk to the Committee
Euan Donald
Assistant Clerk
Elizabeth White
Support Manager
Daren Pratt
Subordinate Legislation
The Committee reports to the Parliament as follows—
1. At its meeting on 30 April 2013, the Committee agreed to draw the attention of the Parliament to the following instruments—
Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 (Rules of Procedure in Children’s Hearings) Rules 2013 [draft]
Firemen’s Pension Scheme (Amendment) (Scotland) Order 2013 (SSI 2013/128)
Firefighters’ Pension Scheme (Scotland) Amendment Order 2013 (SSI 2013/129)
2. The Committee’s recommendations in relation to these instruments are set out below.
3. The instruments that the Committee determined that it did not need to draw the Parliament’s attention to are set out at the end of this report.
POINTS RAISED: INSTRUMENTS SUBJECT TO AFFIRMATIVE PROCEDURE
Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 (Rules of Procedure in Children’s Hearings) Rules 2013 [draft] (Education and Culture Committee)
4. The Rules provide a more detailed set of Rules than the current 1996 Rules. The Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 (“the 2011 Act”) provides for a greater range of children’s hearings, and there are new options as to disposals.
5. The Rules come into force on the same date as the powers to make them (section 177 of the 2011 Act) shall be brought into force. This is scheduled to be 24 June 2013.
6. In considering the instrument, the Committee asked the Scottish Government for clarification of certain points. The correspondence is reproduced at Appendix 1.
7. A children’s hearing must consider whether to appoint a person to safeguard the interests of the child to whom the hearing relates as a “safeguarder”. Rule 9(1) of the Rules places a requirement on a safeguarder to keep securely and return to the Reporter for a hearing, on termination of appointment, any documents provided by the Reporter. Rule 9(2) also places a requirement on a safeguarder, not to cause or permit information obtained by virtue of appointment under the 2011 Act to be disclosed, except where the Act or other enactment allows.
8. Rule 56(4) and (5) impose additional requirements on a safeguarder beyond the report required for the hearing by virtue of section 33(1)(a) of the 2011 Act, in connection with the giving of that report, or an interim report, to the Reporter. (The correspondence at Appendix 1 refers to rules 56(5) and (6) rather than (4) and (5), because these were the provisions in the Rules as initially laid. The initial draft Rules were withdrawn and the draft re-laid, omitting rule 56(4).)
9. The Committee queried whether it is appropriate to make those provisions as rules under the powers in section 177 (procedural rules for hearings), rather than as regulations under the powers in section 34. That section specifically provides that regulations may make provision for or in connection with imposing additional requirements on safeguarders, and the termination of their appointment. If provisions should properly be made under section 34 rather than 177, they should be made in the form of regulations rather than rules.
10. The Scottish Government contends in the attached correspondence that these provisions are correctly included in the Rules, as they are generally concerned with the conduct of hearings and are of a more practical nature. It argues that in particular section 177(2)(i) enables rules as to the provision of specified documents to any persons described in the Rules, as part of the procedures for hearings.
11. The Committee accepts those contentions, as regards rule 56(4) and (5). Those paragraphs concern the provision of other specified documents by a safeguarder to the Reporter, where the safeguarder is required to prepare a report under section 33(1)(a) in relation to a hearing. The Committee suggests that these provisions are more specifically related to the power in section 177(2)(i), than the more general power in section 34(2) to impose additional requirements on safeguarders.
12. As regards rule 9, however, the Committee takes a different view. The rule is not restricted in scope to the procedure in connection with hearings. Rule 9(1) specifically places requirements on safeguarders which extend to the point of termination of their appointment. Any documents given by the Reporter under or by virtue of the 2011 Act, or any other enactment, must be kept securely in the safeguarder’s custody and returned on the termination of appointment.
13. The Committee also considers that rule 9(2) places more general requirements on safeguarders, than solely procedural matters in connection with hearings. The safeguarder must not cause or permit any information which they have obtained by virtue of appointment under the Act to be disclosed, except as permitted by virtue of the 2011 Act or any other enactment.
14. The Scottish Ministers have powers to make supplemental provisions together with the Children’s Hearings Rules (section 197 of the 2011 Act). Safeguarders are appointed by a hearing under section 30. Therefore the Committee accepts that rule 9 does not raise a doubt on the vires of the provisions.
15. However the Committee considers that the provisions in rule 9 are more in the nature of substantive requirements relating to safeguarders rather than incidents of the hearing. Therefore the Parliament would have expected this provision to be made using the powers in section 34 of the 2011 Act to make regulations, rather than the powers in section 177 to make rules (combined with the power to make supplemental provisions in section 197).
16. The Committee draws the Rules to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground (g). Rule 9 has been made by what appears to be an unusual or unexpected use of the powers conferred by the parent statute (the Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011).
17. The Committee considers that rule 9 is made by an unusual or unexpected use of the powers in section 177 of the Act to make rules about the procedure relating to children’s hearings, combined with the powers in section 195(2) to make incidental, supplemental or consequential provision. It is considered that it would have been a more usual or expected use of powers to have made the provisions contained in rule 9 by regulation under section 34, which specifically deals with imposing additional requirements on safeguarders.
18. The Committee does not consider, however, that this affects the validity of that rule. The Committee notes the Scottish Government adopted this approach as it considers the matter generally related to procedural issues, but the Committee considers rule 9 to be in the nature of a substantive requirement.
POINTS RAISED: INSTRUMENTS SUBJECT TO NEGATIVE PROCEDURE
Firemen’s Pension Scheme (Amendment) (Scotland) Order 2013 (SSI 2013/128) (Justice Committee)
19. The Order makes provision to apply the second stage of increases to the members’ contributions from 1 May 2013, in relation to the Firefighters’ Pension Scheme (Scotland) which is contained in the 1992 Order.
20. The Order will come into force on 1 May 2013.
21. As there has been a failure to comply with the laying requirements in section 28(2) of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010, the Scottish Ministers provided a letter to the Presiding Officer explaining that failure. The correspondence refers to both this instrument and SSI 2013/129 and is reproduced at Appendix 2.
22. It appears from the letter to the Presiding Officer that the contribution rates which are set by this instrument are required, as a matter of policy, to be aligned throughout the UK. The last paragraph narrates that the appropriate rates were communicated timeously in respect of the NHS and Teachers pension schemes, but the rates in respect of the firefighters’ schemes were only confirmed to the Scottish Government by the Department for Communities and Local Government on 26 March 2013.
23. The Committee draws the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground (j). There has been a failure to lay the instrument at least 28 days before it comes into force, as required by section 28(2) of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010.
24. The Committee recognises that, as a result of the policy adopted, the instrument required to come into force on 1 May 2013, given that its making was dependent upon receipt of confirmation from the Department for Communities and Local Government of the applicable contribution rates, which occurred on 26 March. It accordingly considers the failure to be acceptable, having regard to the circumstances in which the Scottish Ministers found themselves.
Firefighters’ Pension Scheme (Scotland) Amendment Order 2013 (SSI 2013/129) (Justice Committee)
25. The Order makes provision to apply the second stage of increases to the members’ contributions from 1 May 2013, in relation to the New Firefighters’ Pension Scheme (Scotland) which is contained in the 2007 Order.
26. The Order comes into force on 1 May 2013.
27. As there has been a failure to comply with the laying requirements in section 28(2) of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010, the Scottish Ministers provided a letter to the Presiding Officer explaining that failure. The correspondence refers to both this instrument and SSI 2013/128 and is reproduced at Appendix 2.
28. As for SSI 2013/128, it appears from the letter to the Presiding Officer that the contribution rates which are set by this instrument are required, as a matter of policy, to be aligned throughout the UK. The last paragraph narrates that the appropriate rates were communicated timeously in respect of the NHS and Teachers pension schemes, but the rates in respect of the firefighters’ schemes were only confirmed to the Scottish Government by the Department for Communities and Local Government on 26 March 2013.
29. The Committee draws the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground (j). There has been a failure to lay the instrument at least 28 days before it comes into force, as required by section 28(2) of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010.
30. The Committee recognises that, as a result of the policy adopted, the instrument required to come into force on 1 May 2013, given that its making was dependent upon receipt of confirmation from the Department for Communities and Local Government of the applicable contribution rates, which occurred on 26 March. It accordingly considers the failure to be acceptable, having regard to the circumstances in which the Scottish Ministers found themselves.
NO POINTS RAISED
31. At its meeting on 30 April 2013, the Committee considered the following instruments and determined that it did not need to draw the attention of the Parliament to any of the instruments on any grounds within its remit:
Education and Culture
Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 (Review of Contact Directions and Definition of Relevant Person) Order 2013 [draft]
Public Services Reform (Scotland) Act 2010 Modification Order 2013 [draft]
Justice
Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (Scottish Public Authorities) Amendment Order 2013 (SSI 2013/126)
Scottish Civil Justice Council and Criminal Legal Assistance Act 2013 (Commencement No. 1, Transitional and Transitory Provisions) Order 2013 (SSI 2013/124 (C.9))
Rural Affairs, Climate Change and Environment
Action Programme for Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2013 (SSI 2013/123)
Environmental Information (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2013 (SSI 2013/127)
APPENDIX 1
Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 (Rules of Procedure in Children’s Hearings) Rules 2013 [draft]
On 19 April 2013, the Scottish Government was asked:
1. The Policy Notes for instruments previously laid have explained in relation to those instruments that, while they come into force when other provisions of the 2011 Act are to be brought into force, the scheduled commencement date for the pending series of instruments under the 2011 Act is 24 June 2013.
As it is not explained in the Policy Note for this instrument, please clarify whether the scheduled commencement date for the Rules is equally 24 June (when section 177 of the Act is scheduled to be commenced also)?
2. Rule 9 places a requirement on a safeguarder to keep securely and return to the reporter on termination of appointment any documents provided by the Reporter, and a requirement that a safeguarder must not cause or permit information obtained by virtue of appointment under the 2011 Act to be disclosed, except where the Act or other enactment allows. Rule 56(5) and (6) imposes additional requirements on a safeguarder beyond the report required for the hearing by section 33(1)(a), to give a report or interim report to the Reporter.
(a) Please explain why it has been considered appropriate to make those provisions as rules under the powers in section 177 to make procedural rules for hearings, rather than as regulations under the powers in section 34, which specifically provides that regulations may make provision for or in connection with imposing additional requirements on safeguarders, and the termination of their appointment?
(b) If it is considered that rules 9 and 56(5) and (6) should properly have been made under section 34 by regulation, what is the effect of the rules?
3. Section 33(1) requires any safeguarder appointed by virtue of section 30 by a children’s hearing, on being appointed, to prepare a report for the hearing. Rule 56(4) modifies the section, by providing that a safeguarder is not required to prepare a report where the safeguarder is appointed by a pre-hearing panel before a grounds hearing, or a hearing held by virtue of sections 45, 46, 50, 96, 123, 126, or 158 of the 2011 Act.
(a) Please explain the basis on which those modifying provisions are made under the powers in sections 177 and 195 of the Act (given that those powers do not include provision permitting modification of the Act) rather than under section 204, which specifically enables ancillary provisions by order which modify the Act, to make supplemental, etc. provision for the purposes of the Act?
(b) Separately if reliance is placed on the power under section 177 which is not yet in force, is it considered that power could be used to derogate from the terms of the Act on an “anticipatory” basis (and why)?
(c) If it is considered that rule 56(4) would be made under the powers in section 204 (though this is not cited in the preamble), please explain—
(i) how the provision is considered appropriate for the purposes of, in consequence of, or to give full effect to the Act, and
(ii) what the effect of it is, given that section 204 enables provision by order rather than rule (subject to the negative procedure where there is no textual amendment of the Act)?
4. Rule 33 (setting out requirements for provision of information in advance of certain hearings) applies where section 109(7), 115(5) or 117(5) of the Act applies. The footnote to the rule explains that sections 115(5) and 117(5) are to be inserted into the Act by the Children’s Hearings (S) Act 2011 (Modification of Primary Legislation) Order 2013.
(a) Please explain the effect of this provision, given that that 2013 Order has not yet been made or laid in Parliament. Would it have been possible just to have made further provision explaining when the rule applies, rather than by making that reference?
(b) Please confirm when it is anticipated that that Order will be laid and made, and why it can only be laid and made later than these Rules, and
(c) Are you in a position to explain the provision that will be made in those sections 115(5) and 117(5)?
5. Part 21 makes specific provisions for hearings arranged under the Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 (Implementation of Secure Accommodation Authorisation) (S) Regulations 2013, and cross-refer in several places to those Regulations. (In relation to the Children's Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 (Safeguarders: Further Provision) Regulations 2012, the Committee reported that regulation 4(4) refers to provisions in those yet to be made Regulations .) Without sight of this further instrument, the Parliament is not able to be wholly clear as to the application and effect of Part 21, in the period permitted for scrutiny of these Rules.
(a) Please explain the effect of Part 21, given that it applies where a hearing is to be arranged by virtue of regulation 9 of the 2013 Regulations which are yet to be made, and that Part refers in various places to those Regulations. Please explain why those Regulations could not be made or laid in advance of the laying of these Rules?
(b) Please confirm when it is anticipated those Regulations will be laid and made.
(c) Are you in a position to send a draft of those Regulations to assist in the scrutiny of Part 21?
6. Paragraph (2) of rule 26 makes provision for copy documents to be provided by the Reporter to specified persons in advance of a children’s hearing, and expressly excludes the requirement where the person provided the document. Paragraph (3) provides that where the Reporter obtains any information (including any views of the child given orally to the reporter) which is material to the hearing, the reporter must give that information to the specified persons as soon as possible before the hearing. For this purpose the specified persons include the child, and so the plain meaning is that the oral information shall be given back to the child.
Please clarify the intended effect of that provision in paragraph (3), and whether (contrary to the plain meaning) there may be any intention either to provide for an express exclusion, that the oral views of the child given to the Reporter need not be given back to the child; or to provide that the Reporter must give any such views back to the child (and to the other persons specified in paragraph (4)), but narrated in a copy document? (Cf. rule 27(6)(c) requiring provision of “a copy of” any views of the child?)
The Scottish Government responded as follows:
1. As recorded in page 7 of the Policy Note the proposed date for commencement of these Rules is 24 June 2013.
2 (a) The provisions of rules 9 and 56(5) and (6) are concerned with the conduct of Children’s Hearings and the role of safeguarders. It is considered that these provisions should be included in the Procedure Rules given that these Rules are generally concerned with the conduct of hearings. Regulations under section 34 of the Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 do not appear to be the appropriate place to include provisions of a practical nature such as are found in rules 9 and 56(5) and (6). These provisions are, in the Scottish Government’s view, concerned with procedure relating to children’s hearings. While the list in section 177(2) of the Act does not purport to be exhaustive of the matters that may be included in Rules made under section 177(1) the provisions of section 177(2)(i) suggest that the provisions of rules 9 and 56(5) and (6) may competently be included.
(b) This question falls in light of the answer to question (2)(a).
3 (a) The Scottish Government is grateful for this matter being drawn to its attention. Given the terms of section 33(1) of the Act it is accepted that a report requires to be prepared by the safeguarder. Consequently the Scottish Government has arranged for the draft Rules to be withdrawn and a further draft has been laid with the provisions of rule 56(4) of the previous draft removed.
(b) and (c) These questions fall in light of the answer to question (3)(a).
4 (a) The 2013 Order will be made and brought into force at the same time as these Rules come into force so that with effect from 24 June 2013 there will be a package of instruments in force that, read together, make the necessary provision to fully implement the Act. It would have been possible to make provision in rule 33 that repeats the terms of what will appear in sections 115(5) and 117(5) but it would have been unusual to do so for the purpose of giving effect to the Rules from 24 June 2013. It is considered that the usual practice would be to cross-refer to the relevant provisions in the 2011 Act as has been done.
(b) The 2013 Order should be laid on 6 May 2013. The order in which the various instruments required to fully implement the 2011 Act are laid has been given careful consideration. It was considered undesirable to lay all of the instruments on the same date, although that would have been one approach that was considered and rejected on the grounds that it would be unhelpful to both the Parliament and interested parties. It would have meant that interested parties had no notice of any of the provisions to be made by subordinate legislation until the final instrument was ready to be laid.
(c) The new sub-sections added to sections 115 and 117 will provide, in short, that if the sheriff makes an interim compulsory supervision order specifying that the child is to reside in a place of safety the children’s hearing must take place no later than the 3rd day after the day on which the child begins to reside in the place of safety.
5 (a) Part 21 makes provision in relation to a children’s hearing that has to be held for the purpose of reviewing a decision to implement a secure accommodation authorisation. The relevant Regulations will be brought into force on 24 June 2013. At the present time they are being finalised. The key provisions, for the purposes of these Rules, is who requires to be notified of the date, time and place of the hearing.
(b) At present it is planned to lay a draft of the instrument on 29 April 2013.
(c) A copy of the current draft of the Regulations, which may be subject to change, is attached for information only and not for wider circulation.
6. The intention is that if the Reporter is sharing oral information given by the child with others the information shared will also be given to the child, and it is considered that this is achieved by the current wording. While the rule is silent as to how any oral information given by the child is conveyed to others it is anticipated that what will be conveyed is a written record of what the child said. It is appropriate that the child should receive a copy in case he or she wishes to challenge the accuracy of the record and also to ensure that he or she is aware of information given to others.
APPENDIX 2
Firemen’s Pension Scheme (Amendment) (Scotland) Order 2013 (SSI 2013/128)
Firefighters’ Pension Scheme (Scotland) Amendment Order 2013 (SSI 2013/129)
Letter to Presiding Officer: breach of laying requirements:
The above instruments were made on 18 April 2013 under respectively section 26(1) to (5) of the Fire Services Act 1947 and sections 34 and 60 of the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004. They are being laid before the Scottish Parliament on 22 April 2013 and come into force on 1 May 2013.
Section 28(2) of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010 has not been complied with. In accordance with section 31(3) of that Act, this letter sets out why it is necessary to lay the instruments less than 28 days before they are brought into force.
These instruments fix the pension contribution rates for firefighters in Scotland under two public sector schemes applicable to Scotland. These schemes are reserved under the Scotland Act 1998, although the making of subordinate legislation in relation to the schemes is executively devolved.
On 28 October 2010 the UK Government set out its intent on delivering savings of £2.8bn per annum across the public sector pension schemes by 2014/15 by increasing employee contribution rates by an average of 3.25% of pay in three annual increments starting April 2012. Despite Scottish Ministers’ principled opposition to increasing employee contributions at this time and in this way the UK Government has refused to change its policy and indicated that if similar increases were not introduced to the schemes in Scotland then the Scottish Budget would be adjusted accordingly. Scottish Ministers reluctantly introduced the first year of increases in the Teachers’, NHS, Police and Firefighters’ schemes from 1 April 2012.
In a statement to Parliament on 28 November 2012, the Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth, John Swinney, announced the Scottish Government’s decision to implement the second annual increment of UK Government proposed employee contribution increases for the Teachers’, NHS, Police and Firefighters’ schemes in Scotland.
Whilst the UK rates for the NHS and Teachers schemes were confirmed to allow the subsequent statutory instruments for the Scottish schemes to be laid within the necessary Parliamentary time limits the revised rates for the firefighters’ schemes in England were only confirmed to the Scottish Government by the Department of Communities and Local Government on 26th March. In the circumstances and given the shortness of notice, the Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth, John Swinney decided that these two sets of Regulations should come into force on 1st May 2013 (rather than 1st April as originally planned). With the intervening Easter recess, it has not been possible to comply with the 28-day rule and still have the instruments brought into force on 1st May.
Back to top