I am not sure that there is an easy answer to that question. However, we need to be careful not to assume that, on one side, there is Government action and that, with everything else, it is down to the action of individuals. Obviously, individuals make their own decisions about their behavioural practices on the basis of what is most applicable to them and what they can and cannot do but, as Stewart Stevenson will know, in a very rural area, some individuals’ transport decisions are made for them by other people. That is just a reality.
Therefore, I would not want to presume that, when we talk about behaviour, we are talking only about individuals’ behaviour. We are also talking about the behaviour of, for example, companies and employers, which are now involved in a real-time experiment on the capacity to increase the amount of remote working that it is possible for people to do. That has been forced on employers by the current situation, but it represents a learning experience for them about what is and is not feasible. I hope that that is a kind of behaviour that people will be able to engage in, if not on the full-time basis that they are having to work in that way at the moment, at the very least on a much more flexible basis than companies might otherwise have been willing to allow for.
When we talk about behaviours, I want us to be careful that we do not talk only about the behaviour of individuals, who will often have to make decisions about specific aspects of what they are doing on the basis of what other organisations, whether private or public, have decided is appropriate. It is sometimes the case that a behavioural choice that is made is not really much of a choice at all, and we need to bear that in mind.
I think that those specific areas of behaviour and the sectoral basis on which we—[Inaudible.]—are the ones that we want to achieve. However, we need to understand what is a genuine choice and what is a choice that has been forced on people. Those are two different things.